Latin scīre has been compared with an Indo-European cutting/separating base; the exact formation and even the semantic bridge remain disputed.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP RECORD
COVERAGE LEDGER ↗A CLAIM
YOU CAN AUDIT.
A relationship—not a generated explanation. Both endpoints, every editorial field, every citation, and every dossier reuse are preserved below.
scīre
to know
OPEN NODE 171 ↗*skei-
cut, split; proposed source of a discern > know development
OPEN NODE 172 ↗THE COMPLETE RELATIONSHIP
EVERY FIELD, NOT A FAIRY TALE
A proposed development moves from cutting or separating to distinguishing and then knowing.
The comparison belongs to prehistory, not a directly attested change.
Merriam-Webster Editors · de Vaan · Ernout and Meillet · American Heritage
proposed — Merriam-Webster records competing morphological analyses and calls the semantic progression questionable; Ernout and Meillet call the comparison uncertain.
reviewed
CITATION REGISTER
SOURCES ON THIS EDGE
Records the *skeh₂/*skh₂ and negative-compound analyses while emphasizing uncertainty.
Publishes the cutting/separating root and the proposed discern > know bridge.
EDITORIAL REUSE
WHERE THIS CLAIM APPEARS
scīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 393consciousscīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 266nesciencescīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 155nicescīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 400omniscientscīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 406prescientscīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗RELATION / 162sciencescīre → *skei-
OPEN DOSSIER ↗