CLAIM / COUNTERCLAIM / LIMITRECORD 775
DISPUTE
RECORD.
One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.
openprobable
Is the marriage sense simply the original meaning of every Homeric token?
No. LSJ says some marriage-based explanations of Iliad 13.464 and related passages are wrong and directs those uses back to anxiety or grief.
WORD UNDER REVIEWDISPUTE 775
κῆδος
normalized Classical /kɛ̂ː.dos/; no recorded ancient audio · Ancient Greek neuter noun
Ancient Greek κῆδος is an attested neuter noun whose lexical record spans care or concern, anxiety and grief, troubles, mourning and funeral rites, an object of care, and connection by marriage. LSJ documents the Doric variant κᾶδος, Homeric plural forms such as κήδεα or elided κήδεʼ, an Aeschylean play between Helen as an object of care and marriage connection, and a warning that some marriage-based readings of Homeric passages are wrong. Comparative sources place the noun beneath a proposed *ḱh₂d-es- formation and *ḱeh₂d- base alongside Celtic and Germanic material, but the semantic unity of care, grief, battle, hostility, pursuit, and hate remains disputed. The dossier preserves the Greek semantic network, the proposed ancestry, and the explicit boundary as separate claim layers.
01DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE
1 SOURCES WITH A STANCE
A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.
SOURCE 01supportshistorical dictionary
Liddell–Scott–Jones Greek-English Lexicon — κῆδος
Preserves the lexicographic correction.
Sense II note: some wrongly explain Iliad 13.464 and related passages- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Henry George Liddell · Robert Scott · Henry Stuart Jones · Scaife ATLAS editors
- YEAR
- 1940
- PUBLISHER
- Tufts University · Scaife ATLAS
02 / EDITORIAL STATE
THE QUESTION REMAINS OPEN.
- CONFIDENCE
- probable
- STATUS
- open
- LEGACY SOURCE SUMMARY
- The lexicon explicitly marks a historical interpretive error, while the full scholarly debate is not reproduced here.
WHY NO RESOLUTIONThe reviewed evidence does not yet warrant collapsing the competing or incomplete analyses into one secure answer.