Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic — *fi(j)ēn- and *fi(j)and-
Publishes the qualified route used in the graph.
p. 140, deeper analysis of *fi(j)ēn-- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Guus Kroonen
- YEAR
- 2013
- PUBLISHER
- Brill
PERMANENT DISPUTE RECORD
ALL DISPUTES ↗One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.
Only as a qualified proposal. Kroonen and EWN publish deeper laryngeal-bearing analyses, but their notation and intermediate formation differ and the harm, blame, suffering, hostility, and hate path is not uniquely recoverable.
/ˈvɛijɑnt/ · Dutch masculine noun
The ordinary Dutch noun for an enemy or opponent descends through Middle Dutch viant or vient and Old Dutch fīunt or fīant from a Germanic present-participial formation: literally the hating one. ONW counts twenty-six Old Dutch records and says the corresponding hate verb is no longer known in Dutch; VMNW counts 407 thirteenth-century records across enemy, Devil, and monster senses. Several Dutch etymologists propose that the medieval use for the Devil helped preserve the word’s full ending, unlike vriend, but they mark that explanation as possible or probable rather than demonstrated. The earliest Old Dutch Devil reading is itself textually disputed, and the Wachtendonck Psalms witnesses are later copies, not directly inspected tenth-century objects.
DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE
A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.
Publishes the qualified route used in the graph.
p. 140, deeper analysis of *fi(j)ēn-Shows alternative formal detail inside the wider proposal.
EWN *peh₁i- / *pih₁- analysis and non-Germanic comparisonsThe reviewed evidence does not yet warrant collapsing the competing or incomplete analyses into one secure answer.