CLAIM / COUNTERCLAIM / LIMITRECORD 519
DISPUTE
RECORD.
One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.
resolvedestablished
Is modern vijand still a productive Dutch participle?
No. ONW classifies the Old Dutch noun as synchronically unsegmented and says the corresponding verb is no longer known in Dutch; ANW classifies current vijand as a masculine noun.
WORD UNDER REVIEWDISPUTE 519
vijand
/ˈvɛijɑnt/ · Dutch masculine noun
The ordinary Dutch noun for an enemy or opponent descends through Middle Dutch viant or vient and Old Dutch fīunt or fīant from a Germanic present-participial formation: literally the hating one. ONW counts twenty-six Old Dutch records and says the corresponding hate verb is no longer known in Dutch; VMNW counts 407 thirteenth-century records across enemy, Devil, and monster senses. Several Dutch etymologists propose that the medieval use for the Devil helped preserve the word’s full ending, unlike vriend, but they mark that explanation as possible or probable rather than demonstrated. The earliest Old Dutch Devil reading is itself textually disputed, and the Wachtendonck Psalms witnesses are later copies, not directly inspected tenth-century objects.
01DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE
2 SOURCES WITH A STANCE
A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.
SOURCE 01supportscontemporary dictionary
Algemeen Nederlands Woordenboek — vijand, grammar and corpus examples
Confirms the current noun category.
Word class: masculine noun- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal editorial team
- YEAR
- Not recorded
- PUBLISHER
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal
SOURCE 02supportshistorical dictionary
Oudnederlands Woordenboek — fīunt
Separates inherited formation from synchronic Old Dutch analysis.
Morphology: ongeleed and corresponding verb no longer known in Dutch- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal editorial team
- YEAR
- 2009
- PUBLISHER
- Instituut voor de Nederlandse Taal
02 / EDITORIAL STATE
THE CURRENT RECORD IS RESOLVED.
- CONFIDENCE
- established
- STATUS
- resolved
- LEGACY SOURCE SUMMARY
- The historical origin and modern grammatical category are explicitly distinct in the sources.
RESOLUTION NOTEThe dossier uses fossilized or lexicalized participle, never a modern participial parse.