*SET-U

PERMANENT DISPUTE RECORD

ALL DISPUTES ↗
CLAIM / COUNTERCLAIM / LIMITRECORD 187

DISPUTE
RECORD.

One scholarly question. Every attached source. The present editorial state, without pretending the last word has been written.

openprobable

Did Urdu receive cāy directly from Chinese or through Persian?

Rekhta labels the current Urdu headword Persian in origin, while the wider references establish only the Chinese-derived overland family. Persian is therefore probable as the immediate source, not promoted as a uniquely dated event.

WORD UNDER REVIEWDISPUTE 187

چائے

/tʃɑː.eː/ · noun

The standard modern Urdu word for tea, recorded by Rekhta with Persian origin and a historical trail through older spellings such as چا and چاہ.

01

DIRECT CLAIM EVIDENCE

2 SOURCES WITH A STANCE

A citation is not a vote. Each record says whether the work supports, challenges, contradicts, or contextualizes the position—and identifies the exact locus used.

SOURCE 02contexttypological database

Chapter 138: Tea

Supplies ultimate Chinese-family context without a local event sequence.

Chapter 138 — overland cha family
AUTHOR / EDITOR
Östen Dahl
YEAR
2013
PUBLISHER
The World Atlas of Language Structures Online
02 / EDITORIAL STATE

THE QUESTION REMAINS OPEN.

CONFIDENCE
probable
STATUS
open
LEGACY SOURCE SUMMARY
Urdu lexicography supplies the Persian label; WALS and Merriam-Webster supply the broader family context.
RESOLUTION NOTE

The edge encodes the overland family and states the probable Persian relay in its confidence note.