PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
6 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — ¹hatr, masculine analysis
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors
- YEAR
- 2015
- PUBLISHER
- University of Copenhagen
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- historical dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Old Norse hatr has a 54-to-1 grammar problem.
The University of Copenhagen’s Dictionary of Old Norse Prose separates a 54-citation neuter noun from a one-citation masculine analysis—and flags the lone masculine assignment as possibly an elementary error. A directly inspected c.1150-1200 manuscript visibly preserves Hatr, but a visible token cannot settle gender by itself. The reveal is not that Old Norse had two equally secure hate nouns; it is that rigorous lexicography preserves the fracture instead of hiding it.
*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatr
¹hatr sb. m., one citation; possible elementary errorSupplies the lone masculine analysis and the source’s own warning.
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Is there also a masculine hatr?
ONP maintains a separate masculine analysis, but it rests on one citation and the editors flag it as possibly an elementary error. The possibility remains visible without being promoted to parity with the 54-citation neuter entry.
¹hatr sb. m. [dat. -i], one citation; possible elementary errorPublishes the separate masculine analysis and its explicit limitation.
Do the two ONP entries prove two equally secure Old Norse nouns?
No. Editorial separation records an analytical problem; the 54-to-1 citation imbalance and explicit error warning make equal security unjustified.
¹hatr sb. m., one citation and possible-error noteSupplies the other side and prevents false equivalence.
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
hatr
Hirðskrá manuscript record
OPEN WITNESS 373 ↗COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
Old Norse manuscript world
Supplies the lone masculine analysis, manuscript horizon, and editorial warning.
¹hatr sb. m., one citation; citation c790383; possible elementary error · broadOld Norse textual continuum
Preserves the separate but doubtful grammatical analysis.
¹hatr sb. m., one citation · broadNON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
WORD-FAMILY REUSE