*SET-U

PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD

ALL SOURCES ↗
BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYonp-hatr-masculine

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

6 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

historical dictionaryonp-hatr-masculine

Dictionary of Old Norse Prose — ¹hatr, masculine analysis

AUTHOR / EDITOR
Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors
YEAR
2015
PUBLISHER
University of Copenhagen
DOI
Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE
historical dictionary
EXTERNAL RECORD
OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
0CANONICAL EDGES
1WITNESSES
0COMPARISONS
0CONTEXT LINKS
1RANKED REVEALS
2DISPUTES
2JOURNEY STAGES
1WORD DOSSIERS
01

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
RANK 59GRADE A-supports

Old Norse hatr has a 54-to-1 grammar problem.

The University of Copenhagen’s Dictionary of Old Norse Prose separates a 54-citation neuter noun from a one-citation masculine analysis—and flags the lone masculine assignment as possibly an elementary error. A directly inspected c.1150-1200 manuscript visibly preserves Hatr, but a visible token cannot settle gender by itself. The reveal is not that Old Norse had two equally secure hate nouns; it is that rigorous lexicography preserves the fracture instead of hiding it.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → hatr

¹hatr sb. m., one citation; possible elementary error

Supplies the lone masculine analysis and the source’s own warning.

02

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

2
opensupportsproposed

Is there also a masculine hatr?

ONP maintains a separate masculine analysis, but it rests on one citation and the editors flag it as possibly an elementary error. The possibility remains visible without being promoted to parity with the 54-citation neuter entry.

¹hatr sb. m. [dat. -i], one citation; possible elementary error

Publishes the separate masculine analysis and its explicit limitation.

03

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS

EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

0
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
04

LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS

WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE

1
05

COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE

COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES

0
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
06

GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS

JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

2
07

NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE

0
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
08

WORD-FAMILY REUSE

DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE

1
hatr6 CLAIM LINKS↗