*SET-U

PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD

ALL SOURCES ↗
BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYonp-hata-ragn-136

SOURCE
RECORD.

One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.

CLAIM-LEVEL USAGE

5 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.

This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.

lexical corpus recordonp-hata-ragn-136

ONP citation — hata in Ragnars saga loðbrókar 136

AUTHOR / EDITOR
Dictionary of Old Norse Prose editors · Olsen edition
YEAR
2023
PUBLISHER
University of Copenhagen
DOI
Not recorded
SOURCE TYPE
lexical corpus record
EXTERNAL RECORD
OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
0CANONICAL EDGES
1WITNESSES
0COMPARISONS
0CONTEXT LINKS
1RANKED REVEALS
2DISPUTES
1JOURNEY STAGES
1WORD DOSSIERS
01

CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS

RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
RANK 43GRADE Asupports

Old Norse hate was action, contempt, humiliation, and feeling inside one verb.

ONP's 101-citation prose article orders four active senses before its participial and reciprocal branches: persecute; despise, reject, or cast aside; mock or humiliate; and hate, despise, or stand hostile. Fritzner independently moves from pursuit and destruction to ordinary hate. A c1200 manuscript leaf visibly writes hata in a command to love chastity and hate no person. The article's sense order is not a chronology, and the poetic concordance is explicitly unreviewed; the reveal is the documented semantic range, not an invented first essence.

*ḱeh₂d-

*ḱeh₂d- → *ḱh₂d-es- → *hatiz- → *xatēnan ~ *xatōjanan → hata

Ragn 13612: hata gullinu under reject or despise

Anchors the contempt or rejection sense.

02

SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT

DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

2
openchallengesproposed

Does hata gulli simply mean hate gold?

Not securely. Cleasby treats the dative phrase as spend gold, ONP has a separate prose contempt-for-gold record, and the poetic reading itself is questioned.

Prose hata gullinu under reject or despise

Shows that a similar surface can occupy a different prose construction.

03

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS

EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

0
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
04

LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS

WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE

1
hataSOURCE-REPORTED

hata

Ragnars saga loðbrókar

OPEN WITNESS 444 ↗
05

COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE

COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES

0
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
06

GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS

JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE

1
07

NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS

HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE

0
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
08

WORD-FAMILY REUSE

DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE

1
hata5 CLAIM LINKS↗