PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYlexicon-poeticum-fja
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
5 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
research databaselexicon-poeticum-fja
Lexicon Poeticum — fjá, verb
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Lexicon Poeticum · Skaldic Project editors
- YEAR
- Not recorded
- PUBLISHER
- University of Copenhagen · Skaldic Project
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- research database
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
011
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
RANK 42GRADE Asupports
The ordinary Old Norse enemy outlived the finite hate verb behind it.
ONP classifies fjá as poetic and exposes no prose citations. Cleasby, Fritzner, and Lexicon Poeticum converge on three Eddic contexts, while normalized texts preserve active fjá, finite fíár, and reflexive fiásk. Cleasby then points to fjándi as the participial relative that remained across Germanic. ONP gives that separate enemy noun 222 prose citations and a large semantic range. The two corpus totals are not directly frequency-comparable, and neither proves an exact extinction event; together they reveal the asymmetry between a tiny finite-verb record and the prolific lexicalized enemy branch.
*peh₁-
*peh₁- → *fi(j)ēn- → fía → fjá
Headword fjá, verb; count 3; unreviewed-concordance warningSupplies the poetic count with its limitation.
fjá dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
023
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
opensupportsprobable
Are there exactly three surviving Old Norse uses?
Three is the count in the reviewed public Lexicon Poeticum surface and matches the three locations in Cleasby and Fritzner, but it is not presented as a census of every lost or surviving utterance.
Headword fjá, verb; count 3; unreviewed warningSupplies the count together with its limitation.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Do the three poetic verb records and 222 fjándi prose citations form a direct frequency comparison?
No. They come from different public corpora with different genres, coverage, editorial states, and counting rules.
Lexicon Poeticum: three poetic records and unreviewed warningDefines the other side and its review limitation.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Are Lexicon Poeticum dates and counts definitive without review?
No. The project explicitly says the concordance has not been reviewed and that dates, especially, should be checked.
Site warning: concordance not reviewed; dates should be checkedPublishes the project's own evidentiary limitation.
030
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
No canonical ancestry edge currently cites this source.
040
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
050
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
061
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
stage 7supports
Old Norse lexical boundary
Supplies the count while preserving its review limitations.
Headword fjá, verb; record count 3; unreviewed-concordance and date warning · uncertain070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
081
WORD-FAMILY REUSE