PERMANENT SOURCE RECORD
ALL SOURCES ↗BIBLIOGRAPHIC IDENTITYhellquist-1922-fiende
SOURCE
RECORD.
One work. Every claim that depends on it. No citation without a consequence you can inspect.
8 PUBLIC LINKS INTO THE GRAPH.
This count excludes duplicate dossier-path citations. Open the claims below to see exactly how the source is used.
etymological dictionaryhellquist-1922-fiende
Svensk etymologisk ordbok — fiende, scan p. 135
- AUTHOR / EDITOR
- Elof Hellquist
- YEAR
- 1922
- PUBLISHER
- C. W. K. Gleerups förlag · Project Runeberg
- DOI
- Not recorded
- SOURCE TYPE
- etymological dictionary
- EXTERNAL RECORD
- OPEN ORIGINAL ↗
011
CONTRARIAN TRUTH CLAIMS
RANKED REVEALS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
RANK 37GRADE Asupports
Swedish fiende is not built from modern hata.
SO says fiende originally meant hatande. SAOB and Hellquist make the hidden grammar explicit: the enemy noun is a lexicalized present participle of the Germanic fi(j)- verb, literally one who hates. But SAOB’s separate hata article places the modern Swedish hate verb in the hat- family. Swedish therefore carries two different Germanic hate histories side by side: one fossilized inside the everyday noun enemy, the other alive as the everyday verb hata.
*peh₁-
*peh₁- → *fi(j)ēn- → *fi(j)and- → fiande / fiände → fiende
p. 135, present participle from Germanic *fijēnIndependently confirms the fossilized-participle analysis.
fiende dossier ↗truth record ↗89UNVEILING
023
SCHOLARLY DISAGREEMENT
DISPUTE POSITIONS THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
opencontextproposed
Does fiende securely descend from exactly *peh₁-?
Only as a qualified modern proposal. Kroonen publishes the route; Hellquist records a historically different deeper comparison, and neither recovers a written ancestral token or unique original semantic scene.
p. 135, older Indo-European pi and Sanskrit pīyati comparisonShows historical variation in the deeper formal analysis.
resolvedsupportsprobable
Was fiende historically a present participle?
Yes at the inherited formation level. SO says originally hatande; SAOB says it is properly a present participle to a Germanic hate verb; Hellquist independently gives the same analysis.
p. 135, egentl. part. pres. till germ. *fijēnIndependently confirms the same derivation.
resolvedsupportsestablished
Is Swedish frände a cognate from the same lexical root?
Not on the cited evidence. SAOB and Hellquist compare fiende with frände with respect to formation; that morphological parallel does not make the two words descendants of one lexical root.
p. 135, jfr med avs. på bildningen frändeIndependently limits the comparison to formation.
033
CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP CLAIMS
EDGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
EDGE 1143contextproposed
*fi(j)ēn- → *peh₁-
Proto-Germanic → Proto-Indo-European · competing comparative derivation
- SOUND
- The proposed analysis connects the Germanic fi(j)- verb to a laryngeal-bearing Indo-European base through prehistoric present-stem remodeling; intermediate formal analyses vary and are not presented as written stages.
- MEANING
- A proposed harm, blame, suffering, or hostility field develops toward the Germanic verb hate, but the original semantic center is not uniquely recoverable.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Guus Kroonen
p. 135, older comparison with Indo-European pi and Sanskrit pīyatiRecords an older deeper comparison without making it the canonical route.
EDGE 1147supportsprobable
*fi(j)and- → *fi(j)ēn-
Proto-Germanic → Proto-Germanic · lexicalized participle
- SOUND
- The present-participial nd-formation is built on the fi(j)- verb stem.
- MEANING
- One who hates lexicalizes as enemy before Gothic, while productive participial use survives beside the noun.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Daniel Ayora Estevan · Guus Kroonen
p. 135, egentl. part. pres. till germ. *fijēn, hataIndependently states the present-participial derivation.
EDGE 1199supportsprobable
fiande / fiände → *fi(j)and-
Old Swedish → Proto-Germanic · inheritance
- SOUND
- Old Swedish fiande or fiände reflects the North Germanic continuation of the inherited nd-agent formation, with branch vowel development, glide and consonant history, inflection, and scribal spelling represented by the recorded variants.
- MEANING
- The already lexicalized one-who-hates formation functions as enemy or opponent. A Devil sense is visible inside the attested Swedish branch and is not projected back into Proto-Germanic.
- SCHOLAR / EDITOR
- Svenska Akademiens ordboksredaktion · Elof Hellquist · Guus Kroonen
p. 135, fiende from fsv. fiænde / fiande and Germanic cognatesIndependently analyzes the Swedish noun as the branch continuation of the Germanic participial enemy formation.
040
LEXICAL ATTESTATIONS
WITNESSES REPORTED BY THIS SOURCE
No lexical witness currently cites this source.
050
COMPARATIVE EVIDENCE
COGNATES, DESCENDANTS, AND RELATIVES
No comparative-relative record currently cites this source.
061
GEOGRAPHIC AND TEMPORAL CLAIMS
JOURNEY STAGES THAT CITE THIS SOURCE
stage 1context
Proposed Indo-European linguistic horizon
Records a historical alternative without making it the canonical route.
p. 135, older Indo-European and Sanskrit comparison · uncertain070
NON-GENEALOGICAL CONNECTIONS
HISTORICAL CONTEXT, KEPT SEPARATE
No non-genealogical context link currently cites this source.
081
WORD-FAMILY REUSE
DOSSIERS THAT DEPEND ON THIS SOURCE
3 entry-scoped citations map reviewed dossier paths onto the canonical claims above.