*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

15RESULTS RETURNED
3WORD DOSSIERS
3HISTORICAL NODES
3SOURCES
5CLAIMS
1WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

3
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

3
03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

5

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 3

openproposedexact word

Is nice securely related to a root meaning cut?

The Latin knowing family is secure, but the further comparison of scīre with a cutting/separating root is only proposed.

resolvedestablishedexact word

Did nice originally mean pleasant?

No. Merriam-Webster reports early foolish, wanton, silly, and simple senses; pleasant or agreeable becomes prominent much later.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Did kind always mean benevolent or nice?

No. Old English gecynde is natural, native, innate, fitting, proper, or inherited by birth. Middle English evidence adds affectionate and benevolent uses, making modern moral kindness a semantic development rather than the original whole meaning.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 2

RANK 7GRADE Aexact ranked word

Nice crossed from ignorance to approval.

Latin nescius “ignorant” became foolish or wanton, then fastidious and precise, and finally pleasant or kind.

RANK 22GRADE Acontrarian claim

Kind is not kin with a d—and kindness did not begin as niceness.

Kind and kin descend through separate Germanic formations and meet only at the deeper birth root. The adjective first carries natural, native, fitting, and proper senses; benevolence becomes prominent through later semantic development.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

3
05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

1
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.