*SET-U

GRAPH-WIDE SEARCH

MEASURE THE GRAPH ↗

NOT JUST A DICTIONARY LOOKUP

6 EVIDENCE COLLECTIONS

SEARCH
THE GRAPH.

Find a modern word—or search sideways through reconstructed roots, historical forms, meanings, languages, scholars, sources, claims, disputes, and witnesses.

WIKTIONARY VIA KAIKKI / WIKTEXTRACT

Imported dictionary evidence

SOURCE-IMPORTED · UNREVIEWED

These are source reports, not reviewed *SET-U ancestry. A list of templates or numbered etymologies is not an ancestor chain. Scholarly disagreements remain in the original source text.

35,981 English word records · 45,491 etymology sections in this online subset

PARTIAL ENGLISH COVERAGE · FULL CORPUS REMAINS LOCAL

2 source sections across 1 headword matching “Nag”. These are separate from the reviewed results below.

Open the permanent entry for nag →
nagEnglish (en) · Etymology 1Source text

From Middle English nagg, nage, nagge (“horse, small riding horse, pony”), cognate with Dutch negge, neg (“horse”), German Nickel (“small horse”). Perhaps related to English neigh.

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗
nagEnglish (en) · Etymology 2Source text

Probably from a North Germanic source; compare Swedish nagga (“to gnaw, grumble”), Danish nage (“to nag, bother”), Icelandic nagga (“to complain”). Compare typologically fret, Bulgarian глождя (gloždja), Russian глода́ть (glodátʹ), грызть (gryztʹ), по́едом есть (pójedom jestʹ), е́дкий (jédkij).

Original Wiktionary entry and references ↗

From Wiktionary contributors; extracted by Tatu Ylonen / Wiktextract / Kaikki.org. Extraction source · CC-BY-SA-4.0. Selected source text is reformatted for display; language and section identity are retained.

Source dump: 2026-10-01 · Extraction: 2026-10-30. These dates identify a dump snapshot, not an individual page revision.

Snapshot checksums and coverage
SOURCE SHA-256
5ff2c072f8099f2d2ce484bd6957bf179f046d2ad37bc36555edf8bb84cb5291
CORPUS SHA-256
c4c2a77325141846709230e11c2959332acd630d53e52905b72d36211251b081
IMPORT RUN
73216b9a9b78ed3830994bf853103716f5a4dc57099e371e9f8fdc468facca26
SUBSET SELECTION
English-only: shortest normalized query first, then binary lexical order; complete word-language and case-variant groups only. This is a bounded online subset, not the full acquired corpus.

INDEPENDENT SOURCE LIBRARY

More sources for this spelling

These are spelling matches, not a claim of identical senses or agreement. Historical accounts retain their own editions and limits; none is automatically promoted into reviewed ancestry.

Browse the independently attributed sources →
13REVIEWED RESULTS
3WORD DOSSIERS
0HISTORICAL NODES
0SOURCES
8CLAIMS
2WITNESSES
01

MODERN ENTRY POINTS

WORD DOSSIERS

3
02

ATTESTED / RECONSTRUCTED / BOUNDARY

HISTORICAL FORMS

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “nag.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

03

WHERE INTERPRETATION IS TESTED

CLAIMS & DISPUTES

8

SCHOLARLY DISPUTES / 7

openspeculativeposition text

Can one coinage event be named for enemy becoming the Devil?

No unique event is established. OED explains a recurring ultimate-enemy use shaped by Latin hostis and the adversary meaning behind satan, but does not identify one inventor or first metaphorical moment.

openprobableposition text

Can one date the shift from enemy to fiend to one event?

No. The historical dictionary gives a relative post-Christian chronology, while ONP and the poetic corpus show overlapping ordinary and supernatural uses rather than one recoverable coinage moment.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the beginning-of-the-1300s record date the coinage of fiende?

No. It is the earliest use reported by SO, not a birth certificate. The inherited cross-Germanic formation predates the surviving Swedish record.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Why could enemy become the Devil?

OED explains the Devil as the original or ultimate enemy, early translating Latin hostis and ultimately reflecting the literal adversary sense of Hebrew satan. This is a semantic and translation history, not proof of one coinage event.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the eighth-century report date the word's coinage?

No. It is a lexicographic attestation horizon. Inherited cross-Germanic evidence places the formation earlier than the surviving High German record.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Was omniscient assembled in English from omni plus science?

No. English borrowed a learned Latin all-knowing form; the compound analysis belongs inside Latin, not as a new English coinage from the modern noun science.

resolvedestablishedposition text

Does the 901–1000 corpus range prove when vijand was coined?

No. It is the oldest attestation range published by ONW, not a birth certificate. The inherited formation must predate the daughter-language record, and the surviving sources are incomplete.

CONTRARIAN TRUTHS / 1

RANK 132GRADE Aranked reveal

Dairy begins with a woman, then a baker, then dough.

The milk-production place is formed on deie, a woman managing milk, continuing Old English dǣge, female baker or servant, in the dough and shaping family.

04

BOOKS / DICTIONARIES / ARTICLES / DATABASES

SOURCES

0

No reviewed record in this collection contains “nag.” Absence describes this graph, not all of linguistic scholarship.

05

FIRST USES & HISTORICAL OBJECTS

ATTESTATION WITNESSES

2
06

SEARCH IS DISCOVERY, NOT PROOF

EVERY RESULT OPENS A PERMANENT EVIDENCE RECORD.

Matching text only locates a record. It does not raise confidence, settle a dispute, establish cognacy, or turn a source report into direct inspection. Follow the result into its citations and editorial limits.