נְחַת

Where interpretation must slow down

• Historical Strong lexicon digitization, not a current scholarly consensus or a newly reviewed SET-U analysis.
• A root, dictionary gloss or cross-reference does not establish the contextual meaning or correct interpretation of a scriptural passage.
• Only explicit heb/arc source classifications are mapped to Biblical Hebrew/Biblical Aramaic. Proper names and missing or other classifications retain an unspecified language.
• Cross-references are source mentions, not asserted directional ancestry. Missing ancestors in this source do not establish the limit of human knowledge.

An old root, gloss or concordance number does not determine the meaning of every later use. Scripture must be read in its language, grammar, genre and passage context; an English translation’s modern connotations cannot be inferred from a root alone.

This page does not invent a manuscript attestation, a sound-change sequence, a modern scholarly verdict or a complete ancestor tree. Missing detail is a limit of this source record, not necessarily a limit of scholarship.