*SET-U

RESEARCH FRONTIER

SUBMIT EVIDENCE ↗

COMPREHENSIVE MEANS SHOWING THE GAPS

GRAPH → GAP → TASK

FINISH
THE UNFINISHED.

Every open dispute, uninspected witness, uncited journey stage, knowledge boundary, fragile edge, underrepresented language, and evidence-seeded word becomes a concrete research assignment—not a hidden caveat.

THE FRONTIER NEEDS THE LIVE GRAPH.

No static task list is substituted for the current evidence state.

02

HOW PRIORITY WORKS

THE QUEUE REWARDS VERIFIABILITY, NOT DRAMA.

100LOCATED OBJECT

A source-reported witness already has a facsimile link and can be inspected now.

98–99SPECULATIVE CLAIM

A reviewed relationship exists, but its confidence is weakest and needs independent testing.

89–94OPEN ANALYSIS

A proposed or probable dispute or edge has direct evidence but no warranted convergence.

82–92KNOWLEDGE BOUNDARY

The trail ends here; greater dossier reuse raises the value of careful deeper research.

88 / 93ROUTE PROVENANCE

A map point or sequence stage remains a claim; mappable records receive higher sourcing priority.

78–90WORD PROMOTION

A cited relative becomes more actionable as independent sources and connected dossiers accumulate.

74 / 95REPRESENTATION

Thin individual-language coverage and the global family imbalance remain explicit work, not a flattering aggregate.

Priority is an editorial work-order score, not a claim of linguistic importance. Completing a task changes the underlying evidence; the queue then recomputes itself.