Unnumbered source etymology
Original entry ↗To know; to understand.
Perhaps an alteration of wis, taken from the incorrect division of iwis (“surely, certainly”) as "I wis", and mistaken for a verb; see wis. Perhaps from (certainly akin to) Old English witan (“to know”); see wit.
Relationships mentioned by the source
These are extracted mentions, not a timeline or a verified sequence of immediate parents.
- Cognate mentionwitanang · to know
Inspect preserved source fields
Raw extraction fields are retained for auditing. Their order does not establish ancestry.
{
"templates": [
{
"name": "cog",
"args": {
"1": "ang",
"2": "witan",
"t": "to know"
},
"expansion": "Old English witan (“to know”)"
}
],
"links": [
[
"wis",
"wis#English"
],
[
"iwis",
"iwis#English"
],
[
"wis",
"wis#Etymology_2"
],
[
"witan",
"witan#Old_English"
],
[
"wit",
"wit#Etymology_2"
]
],
"references": [],
"descendants": [],
"lexical": [
{
"pos": "verb",
"glosses": [
"To know; to understand."
],
"tags": [
"archaic"
],
"recordId": "3448a79a741d33bce3060ed3f820c74a4cb5dfec84e5d9ef5349dd7a1b3ce21c",
"rawRecordSha256": "fd95b20a44258c9d5a7d9567eb1ddeb366555d797a8ab75fb5eeac8411235b6f",
"sourceRecordOrdinal": 853322
}
],
"omittedAuxiliaryFields": {
"templates": 0,
"links": 0,
"references": 0,
"descendants": 0,
"lexicalRecords": 0,
"lexicalSenses": 0,
"glosses": 0
}
}