*SET-U

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP RECORD

COVERAGE LEDGER ↗
EDGE / 0527knowledge boundaryboundary

A CLAIM
YOU CAN AUDIT.

A relationship—not a generated explanation. Both endpoints, every editorial field, every citation, and every dossier reuse are preserved below.

CHILD / LATER FORM / reconstructedProto-Turkic · Proto-Turkic analysis · fir tree wood root

*kad- / *kad-ï

fir tree; reconstructed base proposed in the boat-word history

OPEN NODE 570 ↗
DESCENDS FROM→
PARENT / EARLIER FORM / boundaryBeyond secure reconstruction · before the reviewed Proto-Turkic analysis · kayik deep boundary

UNKNOWN

No deeper ancestor is promoted beyond the competing Turkic analyses.

OPEN NODE 571 ↗
01

THE COMPLETE RELATIONSHIP

EVERY FIELD, NOT A FAIRY TALE

SOUND CHANGE

No deeper form is promoted beyond the competing Turkic analyses.

SEMANTIC CHANGE

The dossier ends inside Turkic and explicitly rejects chance similarity as ancestry.

CHRONOLOGY

No separate chronology note is attached beyond the endpoint date ranges.

SCHOLAR / EDITORIAL AUTHORITY

SET-U editorial boundary · José Andrés Alonso de la Fuente

CONFIDENCE

boundary — no additional confidence note is attached.

EDITORIAL STATUS

reviewed

02

CITATION REGISTER

SOURCES ON THIS EDGE

S01
Urban legends: Turkish kayık “boat” and “Eskimo” qayaq “kayak”Conclusion — no genealogical or areal relation to qayaq

Supports the Turkic boundary and explicit rejection of false ancestry.

supportsAUDIT SOURCE ↗ORIGINAL ↗
03

EDITORIAL REUSE

WHERE THIS CLAIM APPEARS

RELATION / 491kayık

*kad- / *kad-ï → UNKNOWN

OPEN DOSSIER ↗