*SET-U

CANONICAL RELATIONSHIP RECORD

COVERAGE LEDGER ↗
EDGE / 1145orthographic variantprobable

A CLAIM
YOU CAN AUDIT.

A relationship—not a generated explanation. Both endpoints, every editorial field, every citation, and every dossier reuse are preserved below.

CHILD / LATER FORM / attestedGothic · Gothic historical-dictionary normalization · hate class three jless variant

fian

j-less variant of fijan

OPEN NODE 1158 ↗
DESCENDS FROM→
PARENT / EARLIER FORM / attestedGothic · Gothic textual tradition · hate experience class three verb

fijan

to hate or detest; direct an experience of hostility toward a stimulus

OPEN NODE 1154 ↗
01

THE COMPLETE RELATIONSHIP

EVERY FIELD, NOT A FAIRY TALE

SOUND CHANGE

Written Gothic loses j in some fijan forms before a vowel; the historical lemma fian normalizes that j-less surface pattern.

SEMANTIC CHANGE

No lexical split is established: both shapes remain one hate verb.

CHRONOLOGY

Within the Gothic textual and scribal tradition.

SCHOLAR / EDITORIAL AUTHORITY

Albert Morey Sturtevant · Project Wulfila editors

CONFIDENCE

probable — The variant relation is secure; its exact phonological timing and orthographic interpretation remain historical analyses.

EDITORIAL STATUS

reviewed

02

CITATION REGISTER

SOURCES ON THIS EDGE

S01
Notes on Gothic Forms — Hatan : hatjan “to hate”pp. 451–452, loss of j in fijan : fian

Publishes the historical formal analysis.

supportsAUDIT SOURCE ↗ORIGINAL ↗
S02
Lemma fian — redirect and historical dictionary variantLemma fian redirects to fijan

Treats the j-less variant as the same lexeme.

supportsAUDIT SOURCE ↗ORIGINAL ↗
03

EDITORIAL REUSE

WHERE THIS CLAIM APPEARS